Surrey Family & Mediation Services

FAQ

Reviews

• 

  Samina Williamson

  I've been using this service on and off for 2 years and have found the staff and mediators nothing but helpful and friendly. Would 100% recommend this service.

  27-08-2022
• 

  Rebecca S-T

  My experience with Mediation Surrey was a nightmare. The mediators were unprofessional, incompetent, and rude. If we had not insisted on ending the process, we would have been completely bulldozed by the mediators and the other party. For context, I agreed to go to mediation as a neighbour was harassing me about trees I don’t even have. He had felled his own 15ft+ trees which I was completely fine with. Despite saying this to him on numerous occasions, he sent threatening letters and trespassed on my property. The harassment only stopped after 2 months when I contacted the police. He promised to sue me for non-existent bamboo/leylandii and said I would be blamed for his wife’s possible miscarriage. After going to the police, they agreed that he probably had mental health issues and recommended Surrey Mediation. In hindsight, it was evident that the mediators had no idea what they were doing: -No aims/objectives were set at the beginning. -One mediator (Jenny) was extremely biased from the start. During the first session when we asked her to let the other party know that we genuinely wanted to reach a friendly resolution, she said the first meeting was only to gather information, not to share comments. However, after her first session with the other party, she insisted on reading a personal statement they had prepared without interruption. This included hugely misrepresentative statements about events to date and personal comments about our family. -The mediators refused to look at any evidence. We sent photos to show that we had no trees, and included the aggressive letters the neighbour had sent. Jenny said they wouldn't read or look at them as the other party had not mentioned writing any letters. -The mediators allowed the neighbour to change the process and rules. When we said we were apprehensive about a face to face video call, Jenny said we had to do it otherwise there was nothing they could do to help us. When we asked about shuttle mediation, she said it wasn't a viable option. However, she did let the other party initiate shuttlie mediation without notifying us and allowed them to cancel group calls at the last minute with no explanation. -There was no duty of care from the mediators. They had several calls with the neighbour but left us in the dark for weeks. When I emailed them to say I was concerned about the threats in the neighbour's letter (ASBOs / potential miscarriage), I had to chase for an update 2 weeks later. Jenny said this was completely fine and the threats were not their concern. -When I finally insisted on an emergency call to end this process because it has become so stressful, Jenny blamed me for making the process difficult by being afraid of joining the initial group call. She ignored me when I reminded her that the other party had cancelled it last minute, told me to stop interrupting her, and said she had set up this session to start shuttle mediation like I had wanted. I didn't even know that they had started shuttle mediation because we were given no notification... -The mediators lied to my neighbour about the assurances I agreed upon. They said that I agreed to keep my trees to 6ft - this was not true, I did not even have any trees! I ended up submitting a formal complaint to Surrey Mediation. They acknowledged in a letter that the mediators “contributed to our distress” because their “policy and procedures had not been clearly set out”. Despite this acknowledgement, they concluded that “both mediators did not act inappropriately”! I would not recommend Surrey Mediation to anyone. It was a complete waste of time which made the conflict with my neighbour worse. They took advantage of someone who was going through a mental health crisis so they could close our case as soon as possible. I feel hugely betrayed by the council services which are designed to support and protect us.

  27-07-2022
• 

  stylishnene 01

  This is a beautiful, well-organised organisation. So efficient. In 2 weeks, they got me a mediator, arranged the legal aid, the manager -Tamsin was emailing constantly (so efficient). I was surprised with the service. So fast. The admin is polite in their emails. However, the mediator Jenny was so biased/more concerned about timing . Forcing decisions i didnt want. If I disagreed with things, she will say, well you have to do it. If the man refused, she would keep quiet.she did not even documenting that my disagreement. However I would recommed the organisation but avoid that mediator.

  27-05-2022
• 

  James Anderson

  The service is good. But prohibitively expensive.

  27-05-2019
• 

  Sarah Bartlett

  I felt that the mediator we were assigned made this a positive experience. I was fearful of having to be in the same room as my ex husband in this capacity, but once we got started I felt safe, and free to speak openly and honestly about our situation. The mediator was very helpful and understanding, and had excellent knowledge of our legal system. Despite obvious animosity between myself and my ex, our mediator was able to maintain a calm environment and encouraged us to have civilised discussions about our issues. I would highly recommend this service.

  27-05-2019
• 

  Chris Riley

  27-05-2019
• 

  Super T

  This is Eileen Pereira - Director - Surrey Family & Mediation Services and mother of Hannah Crouch-Pereira (Content & Digital Breakfast Producer at #capitaloffical). Prior to starting contact sessions with his daughter at Surrey Family & Mediation Services...A father was told By Eileen Pereira the organisation had well documented policies which prevented all parents from taking photographs, recording videos or audio during contact sessions. Previously at different contact centres, the “mother” made 6 separate false allegations about the father’s comments. Every false allegation was refuted when the father produced audio recordings, which proved the she was lying. The father was told he will receive a copy of all policies, because none were published or referenced on the organisation’s website. Neither were there copies kept onsite in printed or electronic format. The second time the father asked for a copy of policies he was forced into agreeing to comply with, contact was stopped because the father was labels as argumentative disruptive. The act of stopping contact between a child and father is disruptive and at times devastating to both. In Guildford County Court, Judge Alison Raeside we very quick to act on the suggestion of Eileen Pereira. Needless to say, 5 years later Surrey Family & Mediation Services still have no published policies in place. What’s most interesting is Eileen Pereira association with Ashtead Bowls club. Especially when the child’s maternal grandfather is a formal bowls champion from a neighbouring town. Another conflict of interest which to date has still not been declared to a court of law. . #parentalalienation #alienatedfathers #ashtead #epsom #guildford #surrey #london #imstagood #happy #surreyfamilymediationservices #filthy #pigs #equality4fathers @equality4fathers @capitalofficial #couldoran

  27-05-2019