Employment Appeal Tribunal

FAQ

Reviews

• 

  J App

  Corrupt. Leave disable vulnerable and without any protections or their slary or damages even when discmrination still ongoing to this day. this not the end i file court of appeal because you are SOOOOO COR RRUPT calling someone who never studied law int heir life "familar witgh law" so why solciitors need license and where is mine you absolte liatrs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  26-02-2023
• 

  Shabbir Gheewalla

  26-12-2022
• 

  Belal Uddin

  The legal system here in the UK is totally corrupt, unbelievably childish and tainted with racism. For the majority of people there is no justice at all. I took BGC Partners in Canary Wharf to court over sensitive, disability related personal data that was leaked about me by a member of its corrupt and childish HR team which resulted in bullying and psychiatric injury. Despite strong evidences (much of which was withheld by BGC initially until after the relevant hearing(s)) my claims have been dismissed and a false narrative has been provided by the relevant judges to distort and cover up what actually happened. There are unpublished judgements/decisions for my claims in relation to recusal, costs reconsideration and anonymity. These people are not serious about peace and justice at all. They are from the same group of people who lied to take this country to war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  26-08-2022
• 

  balenostyling 4x4

  Very accomodating, patient and respectfull. After all, you're not coming here for anything exciting. By default it's becuase something has gone wrong at some point in the past requiring ones attendance so to have a calming environment is reassuring. Claimants and respondents waiting rooms are in separate wings to the building but with shared WC's and entrance lobby.

  26-05-2022
• 

  Jeanie Watts

  26-05-2021
• 

  Tahir Mehmood

  I had the misfortune of dealing with two judges of the employment appeal tribunal, David Richardson and Jennifer Eady. I bought 6 claims against a former employer at an employment tribunal and was ordered to pay a deposit at a mini hearing under the guise of a preliminary hearing and then lost a case at the full hearing only with a costs order being made against me. I then had two accidents in the space of five days compromising my appeal to the employment appeal tribunal. So three appeals were put in two of which were out of time. A mini hearing took place in the guise of Rule 3 (7) and Rule (10) Hearings. The purpose of these hearings is to give the public a false guise that their case is being put before a judge before being rejected eventually by the registrar during the sifting process. A the first hearing I pointed out that I was a disabled person and that the employment judge had not only disputed this not withstanding medical notes confirmed this but that he had then awarded costs despite me providing evidence that I could not afford it and that he had lied, a very serious offence in public office. David also a part time pro employer judge refused to accept that an employment judge, his junior colleague would lie and that the alleged lies in the judgment had contributed to my two accidents. I pointed out that some of the stuff that the employment tribunal said was not true which is akin to lying. I also said that people do say things that they do not mean and that they should not just latch on to comments made in the heat of the moment. He tried to silence me because he simply did not like me saying that a fellow judge would not lie. Politicians and Barristers including judges routinely lie in their jobs, when they manipulate the truth. He disregarded relevant information whilst taking into account irrelevant stuff which suited his buddy. He made positive comments about me during the hearing saying I was no liar yet these comments went against everything the employment tribunal said in their judgment. He completely disregarded the fact that the employment tribunal had disputed a medical opinion and this was an error of law. He dismissed the out of time appeals whilst allowing the costs appeal to proceed as a consolation prize. He then tried to pass the buck on to the Court of Appeal knowing full well that I did not have the resources, or the desire to do so. The appeal against the costs order was then rejected by the same registrar whose decision he himself had reversed on appeal for a different reason. I was furious demanding that another judge look at the matter. At the second hearing a more pro employer judge Jennifer Eady was tasked with dealing with the matter. However, it was the decision of Jennifer Eady that the registrar had used to reject the appeal in the first place which was then allowed by David Richardson due to a Court of Appeal decision overruling it. Therefore she should never have assumed responsibility for the case. Unfortunately due to an error on my part (as a result of being diagnosed with depression) some documents provided at the employment tribunal and at the earlier Rule 3.7 hearing had not been provided but these could have been provided later. In addition as this was a mini hearing this omission made no difference as there was still enough evidence provided that was sufficient for the matter to go before a full hearing. By rejecting the appeal both the employment tribunal and employment appeal tribunal in effect facilitated a fraud by sanctioning the costs order. I knew from her body language that she was not interested. At the end of the hearing I refused to rise and Jennifer rushed out of the room as quickly as she could. These judges have no integrity and jump into bed with millionaire employers who they work for in their day to day full time jobs yet cannot handle litigants in person. I have never used the race card in my life but it is very clear. If you go to an employment tribunal without a barrister who is white they are not interested. Even the none white judges are coconuts.

  26-05-2021
• 

  Ad Suleman

  26-05-2020
• 

  Kasia Soloducha

  Complete violation of any law and procedures, Wilful neglect or misconduct, Abuse of the public’s trust, Seriousness of the neglect or misconduct , Without reasonable excuse or justification - Physical abuse, Psychological or emotional abuse, Financial or material abuse Modern slavery, Discriminatory abuse, Organisational or institutional abuse Neglect or acts of omission etc.

  26-05-2020
• 

  Gaming Lab

  26-05-2019
• 

  Anil Hirani

  26-05-2019